Do not for limiting the association will result in bad things to the child's development, eg less association. If the restriction of this association is necessary, then keep giving justice to allow the child to socialize and get to know the environment around him.
The teen who to be limited in socially interacting will be disadvantaged children, and they'll dont know about the rapid technological developments. Although children who are limited in interacting indeed avoid the threat of free association, but there are other impacts resulting from restrictions on teenage promiscuity, for example, the child will be covered when dealing with many people and will find it difficult to communicate this thought to the public.
Restrictions association may be done, but not too excessive. Learn first how children get along and her social environment, from there you can narrow down the association of children to avoid juvenile delinquency and promiscuity as well as children who were no less restricted her social interactions and social relations maintained.
